|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
371
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 21:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Remove local or delay it. Ganker spotted.
Valei Khurelem wrote:What we need is for high sec players to have a chance at invading 0.0, as of now it really is just a bunch of chokepoints purely designed for ganking fleets. If "chokepoints" is all that's stopping you from "invading 0.0", then give up now. You're way too pathetic at warfare to get anywhere.
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:who could care less You mean "couldn't care less". If you could care less, why don't you?
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Also makes me wonder if removing or delaying local means a horses head will appear in Himar's bed.
Indeed the ONE THING that could put an end to 0.0 botting, the removal or delay of local, is not the one thing getting implemented. Make me go "hmmmm". Ganker spotted. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
371
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 21:12:00 -
[2] - Quote
And how many bots are in nullsec vs hisec? |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
371
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 22:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
Opertone wrote:employ Valve to make ENGINE that spots botting. Or contact even balance for free tips. Nitwit spotted.
Herping yourDerp wrote:delay local in nullsec. make it so it takes 2-5minutes to appear in local ( depending on sec level?) this means a solo stealth bomber could potentially hit some bots. Bad ganker spotted.
Widemouth Deepthroat wrote:1min would be fine, perhaps even 30s. Bad ganker spotted. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
371
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 23:02:00 -
[4] - Quote
Widemouth Deepthroat wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Opertone wrote:employ Valve to make ENGINE that spots botting. Or contact even balance for free tips. Nitwit spotted. Herping yourDerp wrote:delay local in nullsec. make it so it takes 2-5minutes to appear in local ( depending on sec level?) this means a solo stealth bomber could potentially hit some bots. Bad ganker spotted. Widemouth Deepthroat wrote:1min would be fine, perhaps even 30s. Bad ganker spotted. botter If I'm a botter, then there shouldn't be any harm in reporting me as one, should there?
Put your money where your (wide) mouth is. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
371
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 23:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
This is where cloaked ships would turn overpowered. :eng101: |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
372
|
Posted - 2011.12.29 23:22:00 -
[6] - Quote
Amsterdam Conversations wrote:Why is it that local needs to be removed in order to have CCP ban bots? Simple. They want ganking to be easier, so they use "bots" as an excuse, regardless of the consequences over time. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
376
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 12:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Xavier Quo wrote:everyone in the game should be periodically pinged with the conversation "are you a bot?" failure to respond within 30m flags you as a valid target to anyone. Every time someone comes up with this idea, even in jest, god kills a kitten.
Please, think of the kittens. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
387
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 15:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
If you think "one player" is supposed to be able to wrest control of one or more systems from 30+ people, then join the supercap club, or get a better appreciation for the multiplayer aspect of this game.
Or get friends. This is probably a better strategy in the long run. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 20:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
Killmeded wrote:CCP could set it so that toons that are acting "botish" or people that were reported would recieve a popup with a distorted text test like u have to for emails n stuff. This would easily foil most bots. Failure to respond would result in banning. This could expand the use of the report botting feature.
It could limit the test to a timer but also to if the toon is still taking actions. This would help so that afk people were not being banned for not responding.
A delay function for people in combat could also be implemented. Every time someone makes this suggestion, god kills a kitten.
Please, think of the kittens. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 20:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
I hope you have better metrics for "botter" than online time, because I certainly have absolutely no problem with forgetting to shut down clients overnight or when I go to work. |
|
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
392
|
Posted - 2011.12.30 20:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
I haven't shot a single NPC (other than maggot NPCs at gates while we wait to jump through), so no.
That's why I said I hoped you had better metrics for botter determination than just online time. |
|
|
|